FORident Software

  • HemoSpat
  • Research
  • Bookshelf
  • Contact Us
  • Home

An Experimental Study to Quantify Error Rates Resulting from Measurement Deviation in Area of Origin Reconstructions of Blunt Force Impact Patterns

Authors:
Mark W. Davison, Timothy M. Palmbach
Journal:
Journal of Forensic Research and Criminal Studies
Published:
2014
Abstract:

The intent of this study was to attempt to quantify error associated with the measurements required in area of origin reconstructions resulting from the analysis of blunt force impact patterns. Mathematical tables were constructed in order to examine trends associated with changing width and length ratios and the influence of impact angle change and area of convergence deviations. The analysis of the trends enabled informed stain selection, mitigating potential error. The analysis of the influence of stain measurement error and gamma angle error was conducted by reconstructing experimentally created blunt force impact patterns using the Tangent Method, comparing the resulting area of origin determinations to reconstructions generated using HemoSpat, a bloodstain pattern analysis software, and then isolating each variable in order to examine its effect on precision and accuracy.

A total of 10 blunt force impact patterns were created and initially analyzed utilizing the Tangent Method. The stains selected for the analysis of each pattern were input into HemoSpat software which generated separate and independent results, enabling a comparison of the absolute and relative error rates between the known area of origin and the two methodologies. This also provided a foundation for the examination of each variable’s contribution to absolute and relative error. Finally, artificially induced measurement error was generated by uniformly increasing and decreasing the length, width, and gamma angle values of the selected stains based on an absolute analysis of error. The deviation from the compared values was examined in order to determine if the resulting area of origin determination would adversely affect inferences related to scene analysis. The results indicate that the incorporation of measurement error into a reconstruction creates an error rate that would not substantively affect an area of origin determination or inferences which would typically be rendered based on that determination.

Citation:
Davison, M.; Palmbach, T. An Experimental Study to Quantify Error Rates Resulting from Measurement Deviation in Area of Origin Reconstructions of Blunt Force Impact Patterns. J. Forensic Res. Crime Stud. 2014, 1, 1-12.
PDF:
An Experimental Study to Quantify Error Rates Resulting from Measurement Deviation in Area of Origin Reconstructions of Blunt Force Impact Patterns
Keywords:
angle of impact, area of origin calculation, bloodstain pattern analysis, HemoSpat, impact pattern analysis, impact spatter

Forensics Books

Principles Of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Theory and Practice @amazon.com
Principles Of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Theory and Practice
Stuart H. James, Paul E. Kish, T. Paulette Sutton

Search Research Abstracts

Research Article Keywords

3D visualization accident reconstruction angle of impact area of origin calculation autopsy BackTrack biomechanics blood detection bloodstain enhancement bloodstain pattern analysis bullet defects bullet deflection bullet hole bullet trajectories case study cast-off patterns clothing crime scene analysis crime scene investigation crime scene reconstruction crime scene sketching DNA collection evidence collection evidence preservation fabrics forensic medicine head injury HemoSpat impact pattern analysis impact spatter leucocrystal violet luminol multilinear events sequencing perspective grid photogrammetry Photoshop post-mortem interval shooting reconstruction software modelling soil spatter stains testimony touch DNA trajectory analysis transfer stains
© 2023 FORident Software, Inc. | Base theme by Think Up Themes Ltd